The Danger of Attacking Soul Winning

The Danger of Attacking Soul Winning

In recent days, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of Christians and preachers who direct criticism towards individuals engaged in ‘soul winning’—the mission of winning people to Christ. From articles to memes, there is a growing sense of disdain directed not towards the idea of soul winning itself, but towards the methods employed by certain individuals or groups.

This wave of criticism has been particularly sharp against those who choose to publicize their experiences or share images of their converts on social media platforms. While this may not align with everyone’s beliefs or practices, it does not diminish the sincerity or significance of the act of soul winning itself. Rather than extending criticism, one might wonder why there isn’t a greater emphasis on encouragement or edification by these people.
It’s critical to remember that individuals get saved by the conviction of the Holy Spirit. In criticizing the methods of soul winning, we may inadvertently ignore that the Spirit can work through our feeble methods. Soul winning is often less about the method and more about the Spirit of God moving in a person’s life. Salvation can occur in myriad ways—sometimes in the simplest of interactions, often unpredictable and unplanned. When the Holy Spirit is at work, the method becomes secondary. Rather than attacking a particular approach, our energy would be better spent seeking the empowerment of the Holy Spirit to enable and facilitate these divine encounters.

Moreover, there’s a concerning tendency to prioritize methodology over obedience. People who witness, though not perfectly, are at least being obedient. Before pointing fingers, we should reflect on our own actions—have we not, at one time or another, been less than perfect in our methods to spread the gospel?

A significant problem arises when one judges another’s soul-winning approach, questioning their motives. Such judgments are dangerous, especially when taking into account the Christian teaching that judgment is reserved for God alone. Why reprove a soul winner instead of offering support? It seems contradictory to discourage those actively sharing the gospel, an action believers are commanded to do but seldom undertake.

The accusation that sharing stories of conversions equates to boasting is another judgment that overlooks the possibility that such sharing could be a form of rejoicing and encouragement, rather than an act of pride. Most expressions of joy or success in soul-winning missions stem from vanity; many are shared in a genuine spirit of rejoicing and testimony.

Instead of rebuking our fellow believers who are actively engaged in soul winning, regardless of their methods, why not choose to encourage them? The act of reaching out, of sharing Christ, and of attempting to lead others to salvation is an endeavor worthy of praise, not scorn. If one believes there is a ‘right’ way to engage in soul winning, it would be more constructive to demonstrate that method through action, rather than mere criticism of another.

The diversity of soul winning methods approaches is a strength rather than a weakness. It is silly to discount someone else’s method as inferior simply because it differs from one’s own. No single ‘method’ can claim to be the most effective or the ‘correct’ one.

Lastly, the condemnation of soul winners seems a misdirection of energy. In a world rife with spiritual need, the critique of fellow believers who are actively engaging in evangelism appears to be a misplaced priority. Could it be that underlying these criticisms is a sense of personal guilt for not participating as actively in evangelism?
In lieu of writing critical articles, one could use that time to engage in soul-winning activities they deem appropriate, thereby setting an example rather than dismissing the efforts of others.

Additionally, it is worthwhile to consider whether there are not more pressing battles to be fought. Attacking fellow believers for how they choose to share the gospel seems to be a sad diversion from the greater commission at hand. Could it be that this anger or resentment stems from personal guilt or inadequacy in our own soul winning fervor?

In conclusion, the act of soul winning is one that should be approached with respect, love, and support. We must remember that differences in methodology are not indicative of ineffectiveness or insincerity. Let us, therefore, lay aside judgment and instead choose to uplift and encourage all those who are working towards the noble aim of winning souls to Christ.

February gift from IBOC

Mondays with Beverly
Mondays with Beverly - 1